Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - $98.02 vs $284.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 3800X - $0.88 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
89.60000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348803 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
38.76651982378855%
Price, $
$284
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $284 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.87020648967552%
Multi-Core
1043
12.273476112026358%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |