Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $98.02 vs $247.71
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-10700K - $0.67 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930 - 195 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
74.87179487179488%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
52.75590551181103%
Price, $
$247.71
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.63892145369285%
Multi-Core
1043
12.810120363547039%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |