Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $98.02 vs $270.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-11900 - $0.51 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 213 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
89.67136150234741%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
40.15748031496063%
Price, $
$270
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
28.544600938967136%
Multi-Core
1043
11.83076225045372%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |