Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $98.02 vs $244.77
- Up to 14% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900F - $3.5 vs $4.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 114% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930 - 60 vs 28 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
28
46.666666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$3.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348802 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
85.7843137254902%
Price, $
$244.77
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
36.27684964200477%
Multi-Core
1043
12.378352717778306%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |