Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - $98.02 vs $169.26
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 150% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930 - 70 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930 - $2.42 vs $3.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
28
40%
Value, $/FPS
$3.5/FPS
69.14285714285714%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348911 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
70
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.26
57%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $169.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
30.66061522945033%
Multi-Core
1043
11.933638443935926%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |