Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $50.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 76% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900F - $0.4 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 147 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
85.03401360544217%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
23.952095808383238%
Price, $
$244.77
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.754176610978526%
Multi-Core
1051
12.473296938048897%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |