Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - $50.0 vs $249.68
- Up to 76% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-11700KF - $0.16 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 381 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
322
84.51443569553805%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
381
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
24.242424242424242%
Price, $
$249.68
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
27.29286663712893%
Multi-Core
1051
10.319096710849287%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |