Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 2641 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $50.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-2500K - $0.34 vs $2.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 147 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
99.31972789115646%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
12.781954887218044%
Price, $
$390.81
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
95.3560371517028%
Multi-Core
1051
54.711087975013015%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |