Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3087 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-960.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-960 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-960 - $50.0 vs $299.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-960 - $0.26 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-960 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-960
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349151 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
190
99.47643979057592%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
16.560509554140125%
Price, $
$299
16%
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |