Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $46.41 vs $99.03
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10100 - $0.39 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349622 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
89.39393939393939%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
34.43197755960729%
Multi-Core
825
19.572953736654807%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |