Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $99.9 vs $115.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-9100F - $0.61 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6700T - 167 vs 164 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280372 minutes ago
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280372 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |