Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 293 days older than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $94.05 vs $99.9
- Up to 7% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i7-6700T - $0.53 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
92.98245614035089%
Price, $
$99.9
94%
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353945 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353945 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |