Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1654 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 59% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $49.0 vs $118.64
- Up to 57% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G4400 - $0.42 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-2100 - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
118
97.52066115702479%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-2100 Dual-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32100
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350210 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
42.857142857142854%
Price, $
$118.64
41%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium g4400
Buy for $118.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
67.14697406340058%
Multi-Core
954
80.57432432432432%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
