Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1668 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $70.0 vs $395.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.27 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-3210 - 269 vs 257 FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
257
95.53903345724906%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349265 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
18.367346938775512%
Price, $
$395
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
51.72764227642277%
Multi-Core
1018
35.92095977417078%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |