Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1463 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $70.0 vs $252.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-7700K - $0.53 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 55 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 43% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3210 - 190 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
39.849624060150376%
Price, $
$252
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
32.39974538510503%
Multi-Core
1018
19.941234084231148%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |