Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 723 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $70.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 82% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-2500K - $0.57 vs $3.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 126 vs 123 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
97.61904761904762%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.1/FPS
18.387096774193544%
Price, $
$390.81
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
78.79256965944272%
Multi-Core
1018
52.993232691306616%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |