Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $79.0 vs $591.89
- Up to 72% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.59 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 114% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3220 - 285 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
133
46.666666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
28.365384615384613%
Price, $
$591.89
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
17.991775188485263%
Multi-Core
1085
5.52640961646208%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |