Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $79.0 vs $531.86
- Up to 39% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900KF - $3.16 vs $5.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 308% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3220 - 102 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
25
24.509803921568626%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348911 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.21/FPS
60.652591170825346%
Price, $
$531.86
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
17.658930373360242%
Multi-Core
1085
5.397741405900204%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |