Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $79.0 vs $468.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900K - $0.71 vs $3.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
89.51612903225806%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.77/FPS
18.83289124668435%
Price, $
$468
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
31.47482014388489%
Multi-Core
1085
13.630653266331658%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |