Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 272 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $79.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-4765T - $0.71 vs $4.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
95.6896551724138%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
16.511627906976745%
Price, $
$498.95
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
57.56578947368421%
Multi-Core
1085
37.272414977670906%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |