Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 686 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $41.0 vs $82.8
- Up to 47% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4370 - $0.34 vs $0.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3240 - 129 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 54 vs 55 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
119
92.24806201550388%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349621 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
53.125%
Price, $
$82.8
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
45.40983606557377%
Multi-Core
1137
47.23722476111342%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |