Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1208 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-2500K - 286 vs 277 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $48.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 88% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-2500K - $0.17 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 54 vs 95 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349584 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
277
96.85314685314685%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
12.056737588652485%
Price, $
$390.81
12%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
62.055715658021136%
Multi-Core
1921
93.84465070835368%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |