Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 808 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i7-3820 - 196 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $48.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 86% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-3820 - $0.24 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349400 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
191
97.44897959183673%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
14.37125748502994%
Price, $
$319.88
15%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |