Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 932 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than FX-8120 - 645 vs 596 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $78.02 vs $219.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-4150T - $0.13 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
645
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
38.23529411764706%
Price, $
$219.95
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361176 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
596
92.4031007751938%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |