Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1893 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4150T - 255 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $80.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 65% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-4150T - $0.31 vs $0.88 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
249
97.6470588235294%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
35.22727272727273%
Price, $
$219.95
36%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361059 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
81.36882129277566%
Multi-Core
1742
57.816130102887485%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |