Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 1991 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-920 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $90.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4150T - $0.54 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
41.53846153846154%
Price, $
$219.95
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360855 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
167
98.81656804733728%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360856 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
48.481308411214954%
Multi-Core
1434
82.31917336394949%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |