Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-750 - 249 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $75.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 64% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-4150T - $0.32 vs $0.88 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
36.36363636363637%
Price, $
$219.95
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361159 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
233
93.57429718875501%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |