Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Core i7-860 - 167 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $48.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 77% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-4150T - $0.3 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
22.727272727272727%
Price, $
$219.95
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361272 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
162
97.0059880239521%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |