Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $219.95 vs $299.95
- Up to 20% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10600 - $1.79 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4150T - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
123
91.7910447761194%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361383 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
79.91071428571428%
Price, $
$299.95
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
54.21152628245726%
Multi-Core
1742
28.210526315789476%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |