Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $219.95 vs $244.77
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i3-4150T - 131 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i3-4150T - $1.87 vs $2.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 20 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
103
78.62595419847328%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
87.38317757009347%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360877 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
51.07398568019092%
Multi-Core
1742
20.674103963921198%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |