Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $219.95 vs $283.35
- Up to 11% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10900KF - $0.34 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Core i3-4150T - 746 vs 645 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
645
86.46112600536193%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361051 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
746
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
89.47368421052632%
Price, $
$283.35
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
48.553601815087916%
Multi-Core
1742
19.029932270045883%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |