Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2279 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $219.95 vs $286.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10850K - $0.34 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 15% better in Minecraft than Core i3-4150T - 744 vs 645 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
645
86.69354838709677%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361052 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
744
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
89.47368421052632%
Price, $
$286
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
49.195402298850574%
Multi-Core
1742
19.15127528583993%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |