Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150T is 808 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-3820 - 249 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $219.95 vs $319.88
- Up to 34% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-3820 - $0.88 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361386 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
240
96.3855421686747%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
66.16541353383458%
Price, $
$319.88
68%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |