Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $219.95 vs $299.98
- Up to 22% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10900 - $0.32 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Core i3-4150T - 732 vs 690 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 20 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
690
94.26229508196722%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361056 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
732
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
78.04878048780488%
Price, $
$299.98
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
50.23474178403756%
Multi-Core
1742
20.686379289870562%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |