Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 639 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 21% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1820 - 171 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $46.41 vs $100.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-6100 - $0.33 vs $0.58 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
56.896551724137936%
Price, $
$100
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349396 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
141
82.45614035087719%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
41.12227805695142%
Multi-Core
825
35.31678082191781%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |