Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-2600 - 137 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $54.95 vs $100.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-6100 - $0.44 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
60.273972602739725%
Price, $
$100
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
125
91.24087591240875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
612
51.256281407035175%
Multi-Core
2054
87.92808219178082%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |