Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 490 days older than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $66.82 vs $100.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-6100 - $0.41 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Core i3-7100T - 167 vs 163 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
97.60479041916167%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
68.33333333333333%
Price, $
$100
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
93.46733668341709%
Multi-Core
2260
96.74657534246576%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |