Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1987 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 120% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 123 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $48.02 vs $178.02
- Up to 41% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-8100T - $0.86 vs $1.45 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
59.310344827586206%
Price, $
$178.02
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361366 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
56
45.52845528455284%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |