Buy on Amazon
$178.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1987 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than FX-8300 - 700 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $47.98 vs $178.02
- Up to 72% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-8100T - $0.07 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
700
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
28.000000000000004%
Price, $
$178.02
26%
FPS Winner
Intel Core I3-8100T I3 8100T 3.1 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 6M 35WLGA 1151
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361327 minutes ago
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
96.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W FX-8300 Bulk Package
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
