Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 3128 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 180 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $48.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - $0.29 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
29.292929292929294%
Price, $
$178.02
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361342 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
167
92.77777777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
41.565703634669156%
Multi-Core
1463
48.33168153287083%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |