Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2640 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-2600 - 121 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $54.95 vs $178.02
- Up to 66% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-8100T - $0.5 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
34.01360544217687%
Price, $
$178.02
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361214 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
111
91.73553719008265%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |