Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 124% better in League of Legends than FX-8150 - 123 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $64.03 vs $178.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-8100T - $1.16 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361222 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
55
44.71544715447154%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |