Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $178.02 vs $244.77
- Up to 11% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $1.11 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 22% better in War Thunder than Core i3-8100T - 196 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 20 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
161
82.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358244 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
88.80000000000001%
Price, $
$244.77
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1073
64.02147971360382%
Multi-Core
3027
35.92451934488488%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |