Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $115.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-13100 - $0.95 vs $1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100F - 131 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
92.36641221374046%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348852 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
84.070796460177%
Price, $
$147.99
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
60.98535286284953%
Multi-Core
3669
50.006814774430964%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |