Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2151 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4570T - 187 vs 179 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $90.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100F - $0.5 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
81.9672131147541%
Price, $
$115
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349281 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
179
95.72192513368985%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1029
74.89082969432314%
Multi-Core
1994
54.34723357863178%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-4570T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |