Buy on Amazon
$115
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 104% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 29% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3220 - $2.25 vs $3.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $79.0 vs $115.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
68%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
25
49.01960784313725%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
71.20253164556962%
Price, $
$79
100%
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
38.209606986899566%
Multi-Core
1085
29.572090487871357%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
