Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 2750 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 23% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-2100 - 172 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $49.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-9100T - $0.35 vs $0.58 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
60.3448275862069%
Price, $
$99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349413 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
140
81.3953488372093%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
38.73649210307564%
Multi-Core
954
30.018879798615483%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |