Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 10% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G3900 - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $39.95 vs $150.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-11400 - $0.36 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
28.799999999999997%
Price, $
$150.95
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349510 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
90.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
29.948453608247423%
Multi-Core
992
13.589041095890412%
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |