Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Core i5-6400 - 210 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $99.95 vs $113.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400F - $0.51 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
94.44444444444444%
Price, $
$113
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
197
93.80952380952381%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
56.65476797552269%
Multi-Core
3023
39.73449001051525%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |