Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $113.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900 - $0.44 vs $1.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-11400F - 276 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
258
93.47826086956522%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354199 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
26.506024096385545%
Price, $
$458
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1961
79.29640113222807%
Multi-Core
7608
58.32566697332106%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |